Search
Contact Me

Email  Twitter  Facebook  Google +  LinkedIn  SoundCloud  Amazon Author Page

Categories
See Dave Tweet
See Dave Eat
Blog Index
The journal that this archive was targeting has been deleted. Please update your configuration.
Navigation
« ink review: diamine damson | Main | pen review: visconti homo sapiens »
Monday
Dec052011

paper review: moleskine cahier

Amongst fountain pen aficionados, Moleskine is known primarily for the inconsistency of their paper. For a long time, I'd had pretty good experiences with Moleskines and fountain pens, especially as someone who favors dry-writing, narrow nibs. While I've switched to Rhodia notebooks for most of my personal writing, I'm still using extra-large Moleskine Cahiers at work. The 7.5 by 10 inch, cardboard-covered notebooks provide great value for the money: a three pack of the extra-large cahiers, each with 120 pages, runs about $19 online.

(about two years worth of notes)

Over the course of the past two years, I've amassed quite a collection. I fill roughly one notebook a month with the notes I take for all of the meetings that I sit through on a daily basis. Typically, the paper is smooth, thin, and slightly absorbent. When I purchased my wet-writing Visconti Homo Sapiens, I was pleased to find that I saw very little bleed through and only mild feathering - that is, until I finished my last notebook and had to buy a new pack.

(old notebook - nice and crisp lines)

(new notebook - feathertastic!)

(new notebook - terrible bleedthrough!)

The paper in the new notebooks still looks like the same thin, ivory paper I'd been used to. Now, however, it has a bit of a tooth and is extremely absorbent - so much so that my wet writing pen creates a feathery mess on the page. Bleed-through and show-through, which used to be minimal, are now commonplace. I feel like I'm writing with a Sharpie.

What's more distressing is that even within the same notebook, I get slightly different results from page to page. Some pages behave like my last notebook, while others exhibit the aforementioned feathering, show-through, and bleed-through.

I use a fountain pen because I enjoy a superior writing experience when using it. Unfortunately, the inconsistent quality of paper in the Moleskine Cahier means that it doesn't deliver on its end of the bargain. Therefore, I'm making the switch to Clairefontaine notebooks. I just ordered three of them from Goulet Pens, and, while they contain less paper for the same cost, I know that I'll enjoy using them ever so much more.

Moleskine notebooks are available just about anywhere.

Reader Comments (4)

Wow that's quite a collection you got there. Probably more than I do. I never like Moleskine's and I've gone out to find better and better notebooks to do my bidding. Rhodia staple-bound notebooks are the best for me. I like Clairefontaine too as the paper quality is slightly higher (even though they are made from the same company basically) and that the bleed through on wet writers will be contained within the first side of the page.

If you have an extra cahier that you wouldn't mind parting with I'd like to try it out for a review.

December 6, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterStevenHorvat

Hey Steven,

Go ahead and email me your address, and I'll pop one in the mail to you.

Dave

December 6, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterDavid Garrett

What a shame--I see this all over the internet though--is Moleskine just NOT paying attention to their customer base? Glad there's Exaclair to swtich to!

December 11, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRori Lieurance

The only one that I have had a good experience with fountain pens is PaperBlanks but they are a little expensive for day to day use. It is a shame about the Moleskines, I have not seen one good review about the paper.

December 12, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterSarah Gabbitas

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>